Where we are talking again of shale gas and risks associated with their extraction - NKM you need anything more to stop everything?
There are one or two evenings a TV show talking about
Gasland , the documentary on the problem of extraction of shale gas in the U.S.. The documentary is a perfect stranger (before the broadcast and awards for his work), the gas industry could afford to deny it, and swing-cons of videos.
But now it's New York Times, which enters the arena. They released a record well documented, and swing
1113 pages of documents EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental) and various mining companies that show that these players are fully aware of the risks. The New York Times even pushes the nail by saying that some of the water discharged after extraction is radioactive.
This radioactivity is particularly addressed in a powerpoint
EPA and disseminated to policy makers in 2009 in Pennsylvania.
Kosciusko Morizet, I know that your predecessor left you a mountain of records all over rotten each other:
-
new approval of approved companies for the recycling of packaging that is screaming the most local elected officials (who are interested in file)
-
moratorium on photovoltaics which may bury the sector in France
-
and this permission exploration of shale gas
on shale gas, the petition which had echoed
Mulhouse my boyfriend, you have established a moratorium. Now we must go further, as
10 000 people have asked you this weekend by showing . It should simply withdraw the authorization. France has the chance to be lagging behind the USA and Canada, so take advantage of information available now to deny the extraction of shale gas by hydraulic fracturing. The gas will increase by a further 5% in April. This rate increase will surely be used by industries interested in the extraction of opinion as leverage ("we have no choice but to find other sources of gas" and blah, blah). You still have the possibility to launch a genuine plan for research on renewable energy. Investing (and by involving other ministries) massively on research to develop production solutions in France. This path must be opened by the state because
as intox2007 said it is not on our French bosses that it takes . The most recent example is the TGV, if the state had not invested in research, let's be clear it would not exist. And would not the engine is known for our exports.
And if you read this babbling, I thank you for your interest in the case of my girlfriend pig, which should not be isolated:
She was taken to a pigeon
by agents presenting as advisors and technicians blue sky EDF, and who managed to hold out the free installation of a solar water heater. Free as funded half by the State
through a policy of developing renewable energy and by EDF for the other half. Result? Go read how panada she finds herself now ...
And I think that this is not an isolated case, last week I was literally harassed by phone by a company that offered me installing "free" (at least it was not too bright) of photovoltaic panels on my roof. After 4 phone calls, I told them I was not interested (sniffing the crappy shot, when I was asked if I lock my credit, it's going to free something less clear).
Such requests will bloom until the state by calling into motion the construction of green energy will help to clean up the jungle of offers.
And he'll have to hurry because
Nicolas Dublog , presidential candidate in 2012 is already thinking, surrounded
leading international experts on a proactive policy in the field of Environment! A word hello.
~~~~~~~~~~~
