Madam Deputy, I rise today
my best keyboard to tell you that I think the laws on the Internet downloading peer to peer control of infringement by a private corporation, and sanctions "progressive" seem unfair and not applicable and in effect:
- The peer to peer networks (Peer to Peer or P2P ) are not used to share content protected cultural and illegally, they are also the best way to save bandwidth for the legal distribuition content such as free software license (Linux and its software but also software for Windows), cultural works under a free license (posted online by their authors and offered under condition of observance of rules clear and simple such as not marketing ...), trying to censor * these networks, you will not resolve the problem.
* "trying to censor" once blocked networks and systems that the state knows the other systems and networks will emerge in other forms using other means and techniques.
- Today it takes less than an hour to enter in a wireless network regardless of its level of encryption, and all the "box" provided by the ISP are shipped with the feature-Fi active (often with the lowest level of encryption) and password Default known to anyone who will bother ... Online there are hundreds of pages explaining how to break into wireless networks.
- An IP address is easily "falsifiable" (it is simply a series of four numbers between 0 and 255, and it is possible to inject false IP addresses in the peer to peer networks to hide the real addresses and such a system resembles a firewall; lots false addresses may appear to be French, even Niçoises, and I would be very amused to see a permanent member HADOPI marked as being that of a notable pirate simply because the IP address assigned randomly by the supplier Access is the same as the French seem to create and injected into a network of peer ...
- Even if France and the world face an unprecedented crisis the problem of major music publishers is not new, and I do not think that either the state bearing their inability to have made the shift to digital having offered sustainable solutions and technically viable, I take as evidence the fact that hundreds of users "honest" (paid for downloaded music at full price) throughout the world have solved overnight, without notice, deprived of the music they purchased after the close of servers (DRM). Today these big music publishers have used the crisis to review their economic system penssant otherwise, great artists (recognized as such) have learned to take this turn Madonna has centered on revenue gig, when Radiohead chose them to sell their music for free price everyone pays what they want / can for a legal download ... and those two swarm, there are artists who sell self-produced CD at the end of concerts.
So what do we do? When you go to the carnival (or Euro-Disney) one pays full price and its entry at the end of ten minutes you are asked to kindly leave without explanation or cons party, well we try to look over the fence rather than follow the rule.
- Moreover it now seems clear that with the offers "triple play" and the unbundling of increasingly widespread, it will be impossible to implement the provisions of sanctions announced, cut the internet it will also cut telephone and television, which may justify the extent of such punishment?
- Finally, what part (s) of the 99 cents the price of a purchased song with DRM that dark unknown artist he is actually paid (s)?
Madam Deputy, it is not too late before blindly approve government proposals I just ask you to inform you.
Pending everything you read or hear soon rejected the draft, I beg you to accept my most sincere homage.
Bruno + (my name and my address.)
This is a blog post on the blog Nono71c, you can read the entire blog address http://nono71c.blogspot.com 
0 comments:
Post a Comment